![]() |
North-east Greenland's Piedmont Glacier (Coen Hofstede/Institute of Alfred Wegener) |
This ought
to be easy. Massive quantities of water ice frozen in giant glaciers begin to
thaw as temperatures on Earth get warm, dumping water into the oceans, and
causing sea levels to rise. That's the tale of our lives.
In the
other side, as global temperatures fall, which occur during ice ages, sea
levels begin to decrease, as the water content retreats from the ocean,
freezing once again in large inland ice sheets.
Since time
immemorial, the changes from glacial to interglacial have occurred in this
epic, continuing period of ice ebb and flow. But the problem is there.
Scientists
tracking these cycles have proposed for years now that there is a "missing
ice" problem: a mysterious difference between the very low levels of the
sea approximately 20,000 years ago and the amount of ice deposited at the same
time in glaciers.
The problem,
at its heart, is this. Based on ancient coral sediment data, the sea level is
believed to have been about 130 meters (427 ft.) lower than it is today at the
peak of the last ice age of the Earth-the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), which
ended about 20,000 years ago.
But
modeling shows that at this point in time, ice volume in glaciers wasn't great
enough to justify such a low sea level. How do we explain the 'missing' ice,
then?
Researchers
seem to have found a solution in a recent study led by geophysicist Evan Gowan.
The
researchers were able to model the evolution of global ice sheets well into the
past with a new reconstruction called Paleo MIST 1.0, far further back than
even the LGM.
As far
back as 80,000 years, Gowan notes, it looks like we have found a new way to
recreate the past.
The model
results suggest that the anomaly in our data is not a case of lost ice, but
rather erroneous inferences about how low the level of the sea actually dropped
during the LGM.
The sea
level fell no more than 116 meters below where the waves are lapping today,
according to the ice physics model of Paleo MIST 1.0, with ice volume (which is
entirely accounted for) clocking somewhere around 42.2 ⁇ 106 km3.
Therefore,
as our LGM reconstruction is consistent with established sea-level constraints,
the researchers clarify, we find no justification for the missing ice problem.
The
misdirection of the missing ice claim, according to the team, stems from a
variety of variables-first, over-reliance on far-field indicators (coral
sediment data from locations elsewhere in the world), which, as we once
believed they did, might not accurately reflect global average sea levels.
According
to one of the team, geophysicist Paolo Stocchi, the isotope model has been
commonly used for years to assess the amount of ice in glaciers up to millions
of years prior to our period.
Our study
now poses questions about this method's reliability.
Although
the missing ice mystery seems to be solved, the researchers do not expect that
the last word on this issue will be theirs.
After all,
the incompatibility of their own solution with cycle-based reconstructions of
oxygen isotope ratio has, in a way, produced a new missing ice problem, the
team admits.
In future
studies, whether and how the current complexity can be overcome is a question
for another day, which could provide even clearer glimpses of the evolution of
ice sheets in the distant past.
0 Comments