Physicists produce biggest time crystal yet

 


Australian physicists have programmed a quantum computer half a globe away to create, or at least mimic, a record-size time crystal—a system of quantum particles that locks into an eternal cycle in time, similar to the repeating spatial pattern of atoms in an actual crystal.

The new time crystal has 57 quantum particles, which is more than double the size of a 20-particle time crystal that Google scientists simulated last year. According to Chetan Nayak, a condensed matter physicist at Microsoft who was not involved in the research, "no normal computer could mimic it." "So that's a significant step forward." The research demonstrates quantum computers' ability to model complicated systems that would otherwise only exist in physicists' theories.

When Frank Wilczek, a Nobel Prize–winning theoretical physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pondered the stunning spatial pattern of atoms in a conventional crystal ten years ago, he came up with the concept of a time crystal. What is the source of the pattern? The equations governing the forces between the atoms don't clearly state it, but it appears to allow any atom to be anywhere with equal chance. Rather, if the atoms cool sufficiently, it develops spontaneously. Once a few atoms have nestled next to one another, the next one's position becomes predictable, and a pattern forms that is simply implicit in the forces.

Wilczek worried if something similar will happen in the future. He imagined a system of quantum particles interacting through constant-force interactions that managed to perform some cyclic evolution even in its most intense state. This proved to be impossible. In 2016, two independent organization’s revisited the idea by imagining a system that is continually nudged by an external signal. They discovered that under the correct circumstances, it might lock into a pattern of change over time that repeats at a lower frequency than the stimulus. A time crystal's signature is a lower frequency response.

The system is made up of a chain of small quantum mechanical magnets that can point up, down, or, thanks to quantum physics' peculiar principles, both ways at the same time. Neighboring magnets in the chain tend to align in opposite directions to minimise their energy, however a locally determined magnetic field causes each magnet to point more one way or the other. The magnets are periodically flipped up and down by a constant stream of magnetic pulses. The notion is that under the correct circumstances, any combination of magnets will rotate once every two pulses. Researchers have demonstrated the concept in a variety of systems, including electrons in a diamond, ions trapped in a trap, and quantum bits, or qubits, in a quantum computer.

Now, University of Melbourne theorists Philipp Frey and Stephan Rachel have created a far larger qubit example. They used quantum computers manufactured and run by IBM in the United States to run the simulation remotely. The qubits, which may be set to 0, 1, or 1 and 0 at the same time, can be programmed to interact in the same way that magnets do. Any initial configuration of the 57 qubits, such as 01101101110..., remains stable for specific settings of their interactions, the researchers discovered, returning to its original state every two pulses, the researchers write Yesterday in Science Advances.

On the surface, the observation may appear to be a little underwhelming. If the magnets didn't interact, each pulse would flip them 180 degrees, resulting in the half-frequency response. According to Dominic Else, a condensed matter theorist at Harvard University, what makes the system a time crystal is the way the interactions among the magnets stabilise the pattern. This makes the system impervious to flaws such pulses that aren't long enough to completely flip the spins. Else explains, "It's essentially a phase of matter that's stabilised by multiple body interactions."

Surprisingly, simply increasing the strength of the magnets' interactions is insufficient. Rachel explains that the interactions must be random from one set of neighbours to the next. He says that if all the magnets engage with the same strength, if one goes wrong, it could influence others along the chain to flip the wrong way as well. According to Rachel, the randomization prevents such errors from spreading and stabilises the time crystal.

Unlike the Google simulation, which involved over 100 researchers, Frey and Rachel worked alone to create their larger demonstration, which they then submitted to IBM computers through the internet. Rachel states, "It was just me, my doctoral student, and a laptop," adding, "Philipp is great!" He believes that the entire project took roughly 6 months.

Rachel admits that the demonstration isn't ideal. He claims that the flipping pattern should continue indefinitely, while qubits in IBM's machines can only keep their states for roughly 50 cycles. He observes that the stabilising impact of the interactions could eventually be exploited to store the state of a string of qubits in a quantum computer's memory, but that such a breakthrough will take time.

References:


Reactions

Post a Comment

0 Comments