Is this where "consciousness begins?"
A
decades-old and controversial theory suggesting that quantum effects in the
brain could explain consciousness may hold more weight than scientists gave it
credit for.
The
nature of consciousness has long puzzled us. One idea, traditionally seen as
far fetched, is that the unusual laws that govern the quantum world could be
behind what allows us to experience consciousness, New Scientist reports.
In
1990s, physicist Roger Penrose and anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff suggested
that tiny microtubules, hollow tubes that form the "skeletons" of
plant and animal cells, could allow for a breakdown in the structure of
space-time that interrupts quantum superposition, the fundamental principle of
quantum mechanics that posits a physical system can exist in two states at the
same time.
This
breakdown of superpositions then allows consciousness to exist, the theory
known as Orchestrated objective reduction (Orch OR) suggests.
Many
scientists dismissed the idea. But the theory, according to New Scientist, has
been gaining new traction lately.
In
one recent experiment, it reported, a team led by Jack Tuszynski at the
University of Alberta in Canada found that anesthetic drugs allow microtubules
to re-emit trapped light in a much shorter time than originally thought.
They
found that light caught inside an energy trap was re-emitted after a mysterious
delay, a process they propose could be of quantum origin, New Scientist
explains.
In
the presence of an anesthetic, however, this delay was shortened considerably.
In other words, the thinking goes, the process of consciousness may be behind
the delay.
It's
far too early to tell if the experiment could actually explain what allows us
to be conscious, and Tuszynski's peers are understandably wary of those
results.
"It
is interesting," University of Oxford quantum physicist Vlatko Vedral told
New Scientist. "But this connection with consciousness is a really long
shot."
There's
also a chance that the laws of classical, not quantum, physics are behind the
odd delay.
Still,
the results have Tuszynski intrigued.
“We’re
not at the level of interpreting this physiologically, saying 'Yeah, this is
where consciousness begins,' but it may," he told New Scientist.
And
his peers certainly seem to be intrigued, if nothing else.
"Even
if you could claim that cell division is somehow underpinned by some quantum
effects, this would be a huge thing for biology," Vedral told the
magazine.
0 Comments