Elon Musk, who was just voted Time magazine's Person of the Year, has announced that SpaceX is launching a programme to extract carbon dioxide from the atmosphere for use as rocket fuel. To say the least, details are scarce, but Musk has stated that this ideal "Will also be vital for Mars," where atmospheric carbon dioxide is one of the only resources that may be used to power the return journey.
Musk
tweeted on Monday, "SpaceX is initiating a programme to suck CO2 out of
the atmosphere and transform it into rocket fuel." "If you're
interested, please join."
SpaceX is starting a program to take CO2 out of atmosphere & turn it into rocket fuel. Please join if interested.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 13, 2021
It's
unclear how folks are intended to "join." That's just one of the
numerous work-related queries that have yet to be answered.
Even some
one-percenters have expressed concern about the damage that such missions are
causing to the atmosphere as a result of the rush of joy-flights to the edge of
space. Unlike Blue Origin or Virgin Galactic, SpaceX is protected because the
help it provides to NASA's research affects more than a fraction of a percent
of humanity.
Nonetheless,
the massive volumes of carbon dioxide emitted each time a SpaceX rocket takes
flight clashes with Musk's attempts through Tesla to wean ground-based
transportation off fossil fuels. So Musk's recent tweet wasn't completely
unexpected.
The value
of the Mars mission concept is undeniable. If a round-trip to another planet
requires carrying the fuel to lift off and return home, the outward journey
will be much heavier, requiring even more fuel and creating a vicious spiral.
Much better to manufacture as much as possible from locally available raw
materials. On Mars, this almost definitely refers to some of the 96 percent
carbon dioxide that makes up the Martian atmosphere. It would appear that practicing
on Earth is required; any carbon dioxide removed from the atmosphere would be a
bonus.
Making
rocket fuel out of thin air in a cost-effective manner to support SpaceX's
current launch schedule, let alone its long-term aspirations, will be
difficult. Neither Musk nor the SpaceX website have stated whether or whether
this is the goal, let alone how they plan to achieve it.
Musk's
tweeting "Yup" in response to an engineer who mentioned the Sabatier
reaction, in which carbon dioxide and hydrogen are mixed to produce methane, a
potential rocket fuel, and water, is the closest thing to clarification we
have.
As many
people pointed out in response, converting carbon dioxide to fuel necessitates
a large amount of energy input - far more than can be used during release.
Cheap electricity is a necessary but insufficient input for the idea, hence it
doesn't matter if the conversion efficiency is low.
If the
Sabatier reaction is used, the downside is that any unburned methane will have
a warming effect many times greater than the carbon dioxide consumed to produce
it. This isn't an issue for escaping fuel on the travel between planets, but it
could be a problem on lift-off. Carbon dioxide might also be transformed into a
liquid fuel. It remains to be seen whether any of these alternatives are better
than directly using hydrogen or another carbon-free fuel, but those with
suggestions for how to do so appear to have a standing invitation from Musk to
contribute.
0 Comments