Bleeding-edge Computers Could Explain a Hole in Einstein’s Most Famous theory

 Understanding the insides of a black hole is still a mystery.


For a long time, quantum computing and machine learning have been hailed as the next big computer revolutions. Experts have pointed out, however, that these techniques aren't general-purpose tools; they'll only make a significant leap forward in computing power for really specific algorithms, and they'll only seldom be able to solve the same problem. One area where they could collaborate is in simulating the answer to one of physics' most vexing questions: How does General Relativity relate to the Standard Model?

A team lead by University of Michigan and RIKEN academics believes they have built such an algorithm. There aren't many sites where the two grand physics models intersect, but one of them is around a black hole. Black holes are huge gravity wells that are totally governed by the physics of General Relativity. Countless particles, on the other hand, are swirling around their event horizons, effectively impervious to gravity but falling inside the Standard Model structure, which deals directly with particle physics.

The motions and accelerations of the particles just above a black hole have long been thought to be a two-dimensional projection of what the black hole is doing in three dimensions. Holographic duality is a concept that may provide a means to search for the critical interface between relativity (i.e., black hole physics) and the Standard Model (i.e., particle physics).



However, holographic duality is difficult to represent using today's computing technologies. As a result, Enrico Rinaldi, a physicist at the University of Michigan and RIKEN, set out to create a novel model that combined the two most heralded computing architectures — quantum computing and machine learning.

Because parts of the physics underpinning the computing platform are subject to those physical principles that are so foreign to us on a macro scale, quantum computing can be useful in modelling particle physics. Dr. Rinaldi and his team employed a quantum computer approach to mimic the particles that make up the project component of the holographic duality in this example.

They did it by employing a notion known as a quantum matrix model. The simulation's end goal, like many physics simulations, was to determine the system's lowest energy state. Quantum matrix models could aid in resolving optimization problems involving particle systems projected above a black hole, such as determining the lowest energy state.



Quantum computer algorithms aren't the only technique to identify those "ground states," as the system's lowest energy state is known. Another option is to use a neural network, which is a form of AI approach. These are built on systems that are similar to those in human brains.

These methods were used on a form of matrix model that was still based on quantum principles but didn't require quantum computers. These were known as quantum wave functions, and they represented the activity of the particles on the black hole's surface once more. The neural network technique solved the optimization challenge and found the "ground state" once more.

These new strategies, according to Rinaldi, are a major improvement above past attempts to solve these algorithms. "Other commonly used approaches can discover the energy of the ground state, but not the full structure of the wave function," Rinaldi said in a statement.

What this means for comprehending the innards of a black hole, or the interaction between general relativity and the standard model, is still a bit of a mystery. The types of quantum wave functions produced by these methods should theoretically be able to model the innards of a black hole. However, Rinaldi believes that more work needs to be done before an underlying quantum theory of gravity can be developed. However, as these overhyped computing designs rise in popularity, it's practically a foregone conclusion that someone will try to shed some light on that black box.

Source.

Reactions

Post a Comment

0 Comments