Zheng-Da
Li and Ya-Li Mao preparing the experiment. Credit: Li et al. |
Complex numbers were first used to formulate quantum theory. Nonetheless, Erwin Schrödinger (one of its founding fathers) said in response to a letter from Hendrik Lorenz: "The use of complex numbers in quantum theory is inconvenient and should be avoided. The wave function is unquestionably a real function at its core."
Bell
tests have recently been used to convincingly rule out any local hidden
variable explanation of quantum theory. Such tests were then expanded to
include a network with numerous independent hidden variables. Quantum theory
with only real numbers, or "real quantum theory," and standard
quantum theory yield quantitatively different predictions in specific scenarios
in such a quantum network, allowing experimental tests of real quantum theory's
validity.
One
of these tests was recently altered by researchers from China's Southern
University of Science and Technology, the Austrian Academy of Sciences, and
other institutions around the world so that it may be used in cutting-edge
photonic systems. Their article, which was published in Physical Review
Letters, shows that quantum correlations exist in an optical network that are
not described by genuine quantum theory.
"Complex numbers have been considered more as a mathematical connivence than a fundamental building component since the early days of quantum theory," Zizhu Wang, one of the study's authors, told. "The argument over the role of complex numbers in quantum theory has raged on till now."
Ernst
Stueckelberg, a Swiss physicist, and his colleagues successfully defined
quantum theory in real Hilbert spaces in the 1960s. While this was a
significant step forward in the industry, their formulation did not use the
well-known "tensor product" to combine several systems. This
basically indicates that their formulation contradicts what is known as
"true quantum theory."
"When
we started looking at quantum theory from an information-theoretic perspective,
interest in this subject was reignited," Wang explained. "In some
information processing tasks, generalised probabilistic theories (GPTs)
formulated with only real numbers turn out to be as powerful as quantum theory,
and even outperform quantum theory in others. We didn't have the tools to
definitely rule out real quantum theory as a viable alternative to complex
quantum theory until today, despite the fact that GPTs have correlations beyond
quantum theory."
Fan
and his colleagues' current paper is inspired by a long-standing controversy in
the physics community, especially the presence of local hidden variables in
quantum theory. In one of their seminal publications, published in 1935,
physicists Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen presented this
critical subject. While many physicists later investigated this subject, no one
was able to come up with a specific mechanism to evaluate whether these local
hidden variables exist for decades.
"In 1964, John Bell came up with the innovative idea of inferring fundamental features of physical systems using correlations functions of probabilities, which can be evaluated and examined in a laboratory," Jingyun Fan, another researcher involved in the study, told Phys.org. "It took another 50 years to finally settle this argument and rule out local hidden variable explanations of quantum theory in a systematic manner."
While
Bell's theorem has been used effectively in numerous investigations, it is
insufficient to precisely forecast the differences between real and complex
quantum theories. Fan and his colleagues were able to evaluate these
disparities in their current study by evaluating a quantum network with
several, independent sources.
"Recently, a group of theorists from Vienna, Barcelona, and Geneva, led by Miguel Navascués, Mirjam Weilenmann, Armin Tavakoli, David Trillo, and Thinh P. Le, discovered that a natural generalisation of the Bell test in a network can distinguish complex quantum theory from real quantum theory," Fan said. "Real quantum theory does not agree with the predictions of complex quantum theory in a network in which participants are connected through numerous independent entanglement sources. This paves the path for a quantum network based on independent entanglement sources to be used to experimentally discriminate between the two theories."
The
researchers employed a state-of-the-art optical quantum network to develop and
evaluate the theory devised by Navascués and his colleagues in an experimental
scenario. Source independence is a major premise of the theory, which indicates
that the investigated network should be made up of independent entanglement
sources that produce pairs of entangled states.
Predictions
become invalid, according to the theory, if this assumption is not met. Fan and
his colleagues employed a photonic network in which sources of entangled
photons are physically separated to ensure that it was met in their
experiments.
"Another
experimental obstacle is that the experimental system must be noise-free,"
Fan explained. "These challenges were overcome by a team of scientists
from Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, including
Zhengda Li, Yali Mao, Hu Chen, Lixin Feng, Shengjun Yang, and myself, as well
as Zizhu Wang from the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
in Chengdu, the city famous for its pandas," Fan said. "We built a
quantum network experiment with two independent entanglement sources and three
parties (Alice, Bob, and Charlie) and discovered correlations that violated
real quantum theory requirements by more than 4.5 standard deviations."
Standard
tests based on Bell's theory, in contrast to Fan and his colleagues'
experimental test, only use a single entanglement source and consider two
parties (i.e., Alice and Bob). The researchers were able to overcome the
difficulties associated with typical Bell's theorem-based testing and
efficiently assess the differences between real and complex quantum theories
thanks to their experimental setup.
"Our experiment demonstrates that not all predictions based on normal quantum theory with complex numbers can be described by the real-number counterpart of conventional quantum theory," Fan said. "Complex numbers, as a result, are important to quantum theory."
The
latest study conducted by this group of academics could pave the door for more
research into the foundations of quantum physics, particularly in quantum
networks, in the future. Because Bell's theorem is frequently employed in
quantum information science, this could eventually lead to the development of
new revolutionary quantum technologies and applications.
"While
Bell nonlocality in a bipartite system is already perplexing, multipartite
nonlocality in our many-body universe is even more so: nature's correlations
are boundlessly multipartite nonlocal," Fan continued.
"Interestingly, we just did the first experiment and established a
Bell-type test for genuine multipartite nonlocality in networks to show that
nature is unbounded multipartite nonlocal."
References:
- Zheng-Da Li et al, Testing Real Quantum Theory in an Optical Quantum Network, Physical Review Letters (2022). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.040402
0 Comments